WhatsApp
CS-03: Shell Mould Casting for Agro Farm Machinery — 35% Cost Reduction — Amsol Industries
03
📷
CS-03 Hero Photo Shell mould cast iron agricultural component Farm machinery housing · earthy green-grey tones 680×600px · warm industrial · green undertones
35%
Cost Reduction
All Specs Met
Longer
Term Supply
AgricultureShell Mould Casting35% Cost Reduction

Shell Mould Casting for Agro Farm Machinery — 35% Cost Reduction

An agro farm machinery OEM approached Amsol requesting investment casting for a set of agricultural machinery components. The components were critical functional parts — required to withstand abrasive soil, variable impact loads, and continuous field operation.

Key Outcome
Customer Specified Investment Casting. Amsol Recommended Shell Mould. The Savings Were 35%.
Industry: Agriculture & Machinery
The Situation

Customer Specified Investment Casting. Amsol Recommended Shell Mould. The Savings Were 35%.

An agro farm machinery OEM approached Amsol requesting investment casting for a set of agricultural machinery components. The components were critical functional parts — required to withstand abrasive soil, variable impact loads, and continuous field operation.

Amsol's engineering team reviewed the drawings and disagreed with the process selection. The components were medium-complexity geometry, the volumes were moderate, and the tolerance requirements did not demand the surface finish premium of investment casting. Investment casting would have worked — but at a 35% cost premium the customer did not need to pay.

The Problem
What the OEM was facing before Amsol.
Customer specified investment casting based on assumption, not engineering review
Investment casting: 7-stage process, ceramic investment, wax tooling — expensive at this volume
Surface finish requirement of Ra 3.2–6.3 µm — investment casting delivers Ra 1.6, far beyond what was needed
Volume too moderate to justify investment casting tooling cost amortisation
Target price from procurement was aggressive — existing quotes were over budget
Amsol's Approach
Engineering diagnosis and recommended solution.
Engineering review identified shell mould casting as optimal for this geometry and volume
Shell mould delivers Ra 3.2–6.3 µm — exactly what the application required, not over-specified
CT5–CT7 tolerance achievable in shell mould — all drawing callouts met
Shell mould cycle time significantly faster than investment casting at this volume
Tooling cost lower than investment casting — savings passed to customer
Process Comparison

Why Shell Mould Was the Right Answer — Not Investment Casting

The customer assumed investment casting was required for dimensional accuracy. Amsol's review showed shell mould achieves the same drawing tolerance at 35% lower cost for this geometry and volume.

Parameter Investment Casting (Specified) Shell Mould (Amsol Recommendation)
Cost per partHigh — 35% above shell mould35% lower ✓
Surface finish as-castRa 1.6 µm (over-specified)Ra 3.2–6.3 µm (exactly required) ✓
Tolerance gradeCT4–CT6 (tighter than needed)CT5–CT7 (met all callouts) ✓
Cycle timeLonger — ceramic shell 24–72 hrsFaster — shell forms in 60–90 sec ✓
Volume suitabilityBetter for low volume / high complexityIdeal for medium-high volume ✓
The Results

What Changed — The Outcomes in Numbers

Every result below is documented. This is what Amsol's engineering-led approach delivered for this customer.

35%
Cost Reduction Achieved
Against investment casting baseline — all dimensional, surface, and mechanical specifications met
All Specs Met
Every drawing callout achieved in shell mould — no compromise on quality or function
Faster
Production Cycle
Shell mould cycle significantly faster than investment casting at agricultural production volumes
Long-term
Supply Established
OEM switched process specification — long-term supply contract established with Amsol
"
The customer asked for the most precise solution. Amsol delivered the most intelligent one. Precision costs money. We only charge for the precision you actually need.
Amsol Engineering Team
Similar Challenge?
Similar Agricultural Components Where Process Selection Matters?
If your agricultural machinery components are currently investment cast but volumes are moderate and tolerances achievable in shell mould — Amsol's engineers can run a comparison. DFM review and process recommendation within 24 hours.
Next Case Study
CS-04 · Agriculture · Investment Casting — 35% Below Target Cost
Read CS-04 →
Scroll to Top